Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence From a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 713 indexed citations. Written by Henrik Kleven, Martin Knudsen, Claus Thustrup Kreiner and Emmanuel Saez covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics and Accounting. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (637 citations), Accounting (385 citations) and Gender Studies (199 citations). Published in Econometrica.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.3982/ecta9113 →

Countries where authors are citing Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence From a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence From a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence From a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence From a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence From a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence From a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence From a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3982/ecta9113.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026