Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs

1.4k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2005, received 1.4k indexed citations. Written by Roger Bakeman covering the research area of Management Science and Operations Research, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (629 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (261 citations) and Social Psychology (235 citations). Published in Behavior Research Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3758/bf03192707.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026