The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics: Methods, Interpretation, Clinical Relevance

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 560 indexed citations. Written by Beata Kowalska−Krochmal and Ruth Dudek-Wicher covering the research area of Molecular Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (135 citations), Food Science (128 citations) and Molecular Medicine (107 citations). Published in Pathogens.

Countries where authors are citing The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics: Methods, Interpretation, Clinical Relevance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics: Methods, Interpretation, Clinical Relevance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics: Methods, Interpretation, Clinical Relevance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics: Methods, Interpretation, Clinical Relevance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics: Methods, Interpretation, Clinical Relevance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics: Methods, Interpretation, Clinical Relevance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Antibiotics: Methods, Interpretation, Clinical Relevance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020165.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026