Evaluating the Quality of Machine Learning Explanations: A Survey on Methods and Metrics

333 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2021, received 333 indexed citations. Written by Jianlong Zhou, Amir H. Gandomi, Fang Chen and Andreas Holzinger covering the research area of Health Informatics, Information Systems and Management and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (208 citations), Health Informatics (47 citations) and Safety Research (34 citations). Published in Electronics.

Countries where authors are citing Evaluating the Quality of Machine Learning Explanations: A Survey on Methods and Metrics

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evaluating the Quality of Machine Learning Explanations: A Survey on Methods and Metrics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evaluating the Quality of Machine Learning Explanations: A Survey on Methods and Metrics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluating the Quality of Machine Learning Explanations: A Survey on Methods and Metrics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Evaluating the Quality of Machine Learning Explanations: A Survey on Methods and Metrics

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Evaluating the Quality of Machine Learning Explanations: A Survey on Methods and Metrics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evaluating the Quality of Machine Learning Explanations: A Survey on Methods and Metrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3390/electronics10050593.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026