Microbial Pigments in the Food Industry—Challenges and the Way Forward

213 indexed citations
published 2019

Countries where authors are citing Microbial Pigments in the Food Industry—Challenges and the Way Forward

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Microbial Pigments in the Food Industry—Challenges and the Way Forward. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Microbial Pigments in the Food Industry—Challenges and the Way Forward with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microbial Pigments in the Food Industry—Challenges and the Way Forward more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Microbial Pigments in the Food Industry—Challenges and the Way Forward

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Microbial Pigments in the Food Industry—Challenges and the Way Forward. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Microbial Pigments in the Food Industry—Challenges and the Way Forward.

About Microbial Pigments in the Food Industry—Challenges and the Way Forward

This paper, published in 2019, received 213 indexed citations . Written by Tanuka Sen, Colin J. Barrow and S. K. Deshmukh covering the research area of Biotechnology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Nutrition and Dietetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biotechnology (155 citations), Pharmacology (61 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (38 citations). Published in Frontiers in Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00007.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026