The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy
- Authors
- Irvin D. Yalom
- Journal
- The Family Coordinator
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/581925 →Countries where authors are citing The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy
This map shows the geographic impact of The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy
This network shows the impact of The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy.
About The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy
This paper, published in 1971, received 552 indexed citations . Written by Irvin D. Yalom. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (383 citations), Social Psychology (190 citations), Sociology and Political Science (58 citations), General Health Professions (57 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (46 citations). Published in The Family Coordinator.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/581925.