Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards
- Authors
- L. R. TaylorEric R. Pianka
- Journal
- Journal of Animal Ecology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/4976 →Countries where authors are citing Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards
This map shows the geographic impact of Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards
This network shows the impact of Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards.
About Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards
This paper, published in 1987, received 454 indexed citations . Written by L. R. Taylor and Eric R. Pianka covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Food Science and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (296 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (236 citations) and Ecology (187 citations). Published in Journal of Animal Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/4976.