Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination

1.5k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1999, received 1.5k indexed citations. Written by Dorothy E. Smith and Avery F. Gordon covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (812 citations), Cultural Studies (257 citations) and Social Psychology (232 citations). Published in Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2653923 →

Countries where authors are citing Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2653923.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026