Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches
- Journal
- Academy of Management Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/258398 →Countries where authors are citing Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches
This map shows the geographic impact of Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches
This network shows the impact of Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches.
About Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches
This paper, published in 1986, received 2.6k indexed citations . Written by N. Venkatraman and Vasudevan Ramanujam covering the research area of Management Information Systems, Accounting and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (1.5k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (782 citations) and Management Information Systems (560 citations). Published in Academy of Management Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/258398.