ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 3.7k indexed citations. Written by Riccardo Conti, Heather M. Coon and Michael C. Herron covering the research area of Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.5k citations) and Strategy and Management (1.2k citations). Published in Academy of Management Journal.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/256995 →

Countries where authors are citing ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/256995.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026