ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK AND THE RISK-RETURN PARADOX: PROSPECT THEORY EXPLANATIONS.

505 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1988, received 505 indexed citations. Written by Avi Fiegenbaum and Howard Thomas covering the research area of General Decision Sciences and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (207 citations), Accounting (205 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (127 citations). Published in Academy of Management Journal.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/256499 →

Countries where authors are citing ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK AND THE RISK-RETURN PARADOX: PROSPECT THEORY EXPLANATIONS.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK AND THE RISK-RETURN PARADOX: PROSPECT THEORY EXPLANATIONS.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK AND THE RISK-RETURN PARADOX: PROSPECT THEORY EXPLANATIONS. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK AND THE RISK-RETURN PARADOX: PROSPECT THEORY EXPLANATIONS. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK AND THE RISK-RETURN PARADOX: PROSPECT THEORY EXPLANATIONS.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK AND THE RISK-RETURN PARADOX: PROSPECT THEORY EXPLANATIONS.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK AND THE RISK-RETURN PARADOX: PROSPECT THEORY EXPLANATIONS..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/256499.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026