Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies1

729 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1999, received 729 indexed citations. Written by V. Sambamurthy and Robert W. Zmud covering the research area of Management Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Information Systems (601 citations), Strategy and Management (167 citations) and Information Systems (115 citations). Published in MIS Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/249754 →

Countries where authors are citing Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies1

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies1. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies1 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies1 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies1

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies1. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies1.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/249754.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026