Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
- Journal
- Administrative Science Quarterly
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/2393553 →Countries where authors are citing Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
This map shows the geographic impact of Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
This network shows the impact of Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.
About Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
This paper, published in 1990, received 23.0k indexed citations . Written by Wesley M. Cohen and Daniel A. Levinthal covering the research area of Strategy and Management and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (15.9k citations), Economics and Econometrics (6.5k citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (5.3k citations). Published in Administrative Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2393553.