The Dispositional Approach To Job Attitudes: A Lifetime Longitudinal Test

561 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1986, received 561 indexed citations. Written by Barry M. Staw and John A. Clausen covering the research area of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (356 citations), Social Psychology (282 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (128 citations). Published in Administrative Science Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2392766 →

Countries where authors are citing The Dispositional Approach To Job Attitudes: A Lifetime Longitudinal Test

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Dispositional Approach To Job Attitudes: A Lifetime Longitudinal Test. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Dispositional Approach To Job Attitudes: A Lifetime Longitudinal Test with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Dispositional Approach To Job Attitudes: A Lifetime Longitudinal Test more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Dispositional Approach To Job Attitudes: A Lifetime Longitudinal Test

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Dispositional Approach To Job Attitudes: A Lifetime Longitudinal Test. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Dispositional Approach To Job Attitudes: A Lifetime Longitudinal Test.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2392766.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026