Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action

4.3k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1979, received 4.3k indexed citations. Written by Todd D. Jick covering the research area of Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (1.3k citations), Sociology and Political Science (878 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (804 citations). Published in Administrative Science Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2392366 →

Countries where authors are citing Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2392366.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026