Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Associative Algebras.

708 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1965, received 708 indexed citations. Written by F. E. J. Linton, Charles W. Curtis and Irving Reiner covering the research area of Algebra and Number Theory. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geometry and Topology (326 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (275 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (273 citations). Published in American Mathematical Monthly.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2311038 →

Countries where authors are citing Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Associative Algebras.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Associative Algebras.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Associative Algebras. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Associative Algebras. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Associative Algebras.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Associative Algebras.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Representation Theory of Finite Groups and Associative Algebras..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2311038.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026