Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China
- Authors
- Jean C. Oi
- Journal
- World Politics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/2010520 →Countries where authors are citing Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China
This map shows the geographic impact of Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China
This network shows the impact of Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China.
About Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China
This paper, published in 1992, received 797 indexed citations . Written by Jean C. Oi covering the research area of Demography, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (622 citations), Sociology and Political Science (321 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (206 citations). Published in World Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2010520.