Sugar and Slaves: The Rise of the Planter Class in the English West Indies, 1624-1713

243 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1973, received 243 indexed citations. Written by Michael Craton and Richard S. Dunn covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Anthropology (146 citations), Cultural Studies (94 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (91 citations). Published in Journal of American History.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/1918379 →

Countries where authors are citing Sugar and Slaves: The Rise of the Planter Class in the English West Indies, 1624-1713

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sugar and Slaves: The Rise of the Planter Class in the English West Indies, 1624-1713. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sugar and Slaves: The Rise of the Planter Class in the English West Indies, 1624-1713 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sugar and Slaves: The Rise of the Planter Class in the English West Indies, 1624-1713 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Sugar and Slaves: The Rise of the Planter Class in the English West Indies, 1624-1713

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Sugar and Slaves: The Rise of the Planter Class in the English West Indies, 1624-1713. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sugar and Slaves: The Rise of the Planter Class in the English West Indies, 1624-1713.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1918379.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026