Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development

357 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1963, received 357 indexed citations. Written by Riley W. Gardner, Herman A. Witkin, R. B. Dyk, H. F. Faterson, Donald R. Goodenough and Stephen A. Karp covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (131 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (115 citations) and Social Psychology (103 citations). Published in The American Journal of Psychology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/1419732 →

Countries where authors are citing Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1419732.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper A Class of Submodular Functions for Document Summarization Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Reverse osmosis pretreatment technologies and future trends: A comprehensive review Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Introducing digital twins to agriculture Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Hard Carbon Nanosheets with Uniform Ultramicropores and Accessible Functional Groups Showing High Realistic Capacity and Superior Rate Performance for Sodium‐Ion Storage Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper I Am What I Am, by Looking Past the Present Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Stable and Highly Efficient Photocatalysis with Lead‐Free Double‐Perovskite of Cs2AgBiBr6 Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper A Melanoma Cell State Distinction Influences Sensitivity to MAPK Pathway Inhibitors Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper What Can Plasticity Contribute to Insect Responses to Climate Change? Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper VEGF-C-driven lymphatic drainage enables immunosurveillance of brain tumours Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention
Rankless by CCL
2026