From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument

285 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1990, received 285 indexed citations. Written by Vaughan Lowe and Martti Koskenniemi covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (211 citations), Sociology and Political Science (95 citations) and History (60 citations). Published in Journal of Law and Society.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/1410160 →

Countries where authors are citing From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument more than expected).

Fields of papers citing From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1410160.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026