Religion and the Individual: A Social Psychological Perspective
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/1386643 →Countries where authors are citing Religion and the Individual: A Social Psychological Perspective
This map shows the geographic impact of Religion and the Individual: A Social Psychological Perspective. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Religion and the Individual: A Social Psychological Perspective with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Religion and the Individual: A Social Psychological Perspective more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Religion and the Individual: A Social Psychological Perspective
This network shows the impact of Religion and the Individual: A Social Psychological Perspective. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Religion and the Individual: A Social Psychological Perspective.
About Religion and the Individual: A Social Psychological Perspective
This paper, published in 1994, received 528 indexed citations . Written by Jack T. Hanford, C. Daniel Batson, Patricia A. Schoenrade and W. Larry Ventis covering the research area of Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health (376 citations), Sociology and Political Science (333 citations) and Social Psychology (196 citations). Published in Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1386643.