Age Differences in the Reliability of the Psychiatric Interview of the Child

416 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1985, received 416 indexed citations. Written by Craig Edelbrock, Anthony J. Costello, Mina K. Dulcan and Noelle Calabro Conover covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (359 citations), Education (113 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (112 citations). Published in Child Development.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/1130193 →

Countries where authors are citing Age Differences in the Reliability of the Psychiatric Interview of the Child

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Age Differences in the Reliability of the Psychiatric Interview of the Child. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Age Differences in the Reliability of the Psychiatric Interview of the Child with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Age Differences in the Reliability of the Psychiatric Interview of the Child more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Age Differences in the Reliability of the Psychiatric Interview of the Child

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Age Differences in the Reliability of the Psychiatric Interview of the Child. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Age Differences in the Reliability of the Psychiatric Interview of the Child.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1130193.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026