Cultural and Contextual Adaptation of Digital Health Interventions: Narrative Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2196/55130 →Countries where authors are citing Cultural and Contextual Adaptation of Digital Health Interventions: Narrative Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Cultural and Contextual Adaptation of Digital Health Interventions: Narrative Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cultural and Contextual Adaptation of Digital Health Interventions: Narrative Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cultural and Contextual Adaptation of Digital Health Interventions: Narrative Review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cultural and Contextual Adaptation of Digital Health Interventions: Narrative Review
This network shows the impact of Cultural and Contextual Adaptation of Digital Health Interventions: Narrative Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cultural and Contextual Adaptation of Digital Health Interventions: Narrative Review.
About Cultural and Contextual Adaptation of Digital Health Interventions: Narrative Review
This paper, published in 2024, received 42 indexed citations . Written by Victoria Loblay, Adam Poulsen, Yun Ju Christine Song, Laura Ospina‐Pinillos, Michael Krausz, Ian B. Hickie and Haley M LaMonica covering the research area of General Health Professions and Applied Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (18 citations), Applied Psychology (14 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (8 citations). Published in Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2196/55130.