Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis
- Authors
- Avishek ChoudhuryHamid Shamszare
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2196/47184 →Countries where authors are citing Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis
This network shows the impact of Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis.
About Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis
This paper, published in 2023, received 228 indexed citations . Written by Avishek Choudhury and Hamid Shamszare covering the research area of Health Informatics, Demography and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (123 citations), Health Informatics (119 citations) and Information Systems and Management (47 citations). Published in Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2196/47184.