Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 377 indexed citations. Written by Lin Lu, Jiayao Zhang, Yi Xie, Fei Gao, Song Xu and Zhewei Ye covering the research area of General Health Professions, Physiology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (112 citations), General Health Professions (80 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (45 citations). Published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2196/18907 →

Countries where authors are citing Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2196/18907.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026