Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis

323 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2020, received 323 indexed citations. Written by Yu-fei Leng, Danwen Wang, Cheng Li, Bin Chen and Zhiling Sun covering the research area of Physiology, Human-Computer Interaction and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (195 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (102 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (64 citations). Published in Journal of Medical Internet Research.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2196/18290 →

Countries where authors are citing Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2196/18290.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026