The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 349 indexed citations. Written by Leming Zhou, Jie Bao, I Made Agus Setiawan, Andi Saptono and Bambang Parmanto covering the research area of General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management and Demography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (187 citations), Applied Psychology (93 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (44 citations). Published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2196/11500 →

Countries where authors are citing The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2196/11500.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026