Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD
- Authors
- Jérémy Wrobel
- Journal
- International Journal of COPD
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2147/copd.s49621 →Countries where authors are citing Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD
This map shows the geographic impact of Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD
This network shows the impact of Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD.
About Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD
This paper, published in 2014, received 269 indexed citations . Written by Jérémy Wrobel covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Issues, ethics and legal aspects. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (218 citations), Physiology (57 citations) and Epidemiology (37 citations). Published in International Journal of COPD.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2147/copd.s49621.