A Review of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Mobile Robotics

455 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2015, received 455 indexed citations. Written by François Pomerleau, Francis Colas and Roland Siegwart covering the research area of Mechanical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Aerospace Engineering (303 citations), Geology (218 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (199 citations). Published in HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).

Countries where authors are citing A Review of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Mobile Robotics

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A Review of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Mobile Robotics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Review of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Mobile Robotics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Review of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Mobile Robotics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A Review of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Mobile Robotics

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A Review of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Mobile Robotics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Review of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Mobile Robotics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1561/2300000035.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026