Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure

232 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 232 indexed citations. Written by David Moher, Florian Naudet, Ioana A. Cristea, Frank Miedema, John P. A. Ioannidis and Steven N. Goodman covering the research area of Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (128 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (76 citations) and Information Systems and Management (42 citations). Published in PLoS Biology.

Countries where authors are citing Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026