Shedding Light on the Grey Zone of Speciation along a Continuum of Genomic Divergence

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 353 indexed citations. Written by Camille Roux, Christelle Fraïssé, Jonathan Romiguier, Yoann Anciaux, Nicolas Galtier and Sylvie Lapègue covering the research area of Genetics and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (250 citations), Molecular Biology (120 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (87 citations). Published in PLoS Biology.

Countries where authors are citing Shedding Light on the Grey Zone of Speciation along a Continuum of Genomic Divergence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shedding Light on the Grey Zone of Speciation along a Continuum of Genomic Divergence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shedding Light on the Grey Zone of Speciation along a Continuum of Genomic Divergence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shedding Light on the Grey Zone of Speciation along a Continuum of Genomic Divergence more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Shedding Light on the Grey Zone of Speciation along a Continuum of Genomic Divergence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Shedding Light on the Grey Zone of Speciation along a Continuum of Genomic Divergence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Shedding Light on the Grey Zone of Speciation along a Continuum of Genomic Divergence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000234.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026