The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update
- Journal
- Genome Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1186/gm13 →Countries where authors are citing The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update
This map shows the geographic impact of The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update
This network shows the impact of The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update.
About The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update
This paper, published in 2009, received 630 indexed citations . Written by Peter D. Stenson, Matthew Mort, Edward V. Ball, Andrew D. Phillips, Nick Thomas and D.N. Cooper covering the research area of Genetics, Molecular Biology and Cancer Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (431 citations), Genetics (258 citations), Cancer Research (56 citations), Physiology (55 citations) and Surgery (47 citations). Published in Genome Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1186/gm13.