Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture

866 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2004, received 866 indexed citations. Written by Geert Hofstede and Robert R. McCrae covering the research area of Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (366 citations), Sociology and Political Science (278 citations) and Clinical Psychology (178 citations). Published in Cross-Cultural Research.

Countries where authors are citing Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1177/1069397103259443.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026