Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over Twenty-Five Years

513 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 513 indexed citations. Written by Guy Michaels, Ashwini Natraj and John Van Reenen covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (410 citations), Sociology and Political Science (132 citations) and General Health Professions (123 citations). Published in The Review of Economics and Statistics.

Countries where authors are citing Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over Twenty-Five Years

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over Twenty-Five Years. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over Twenty-Five Years with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over Twenty-Five Years more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over Twenty-Five Years

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over Twenty-Five Years. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over Twenty-Five Years.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00366.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026