Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization

475 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1994, received 475 indexed citations. Written by Evin Cramer, J. E. Dennis, Paul D. Frank, Robert Michael Lewis and Gregory R. Shubin covering the research area of Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Theory and Mathematics (224 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (149 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (125 citations). Published in SIAM Journal on Optimization.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1137/0804044 →

Countries where authors are citing Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1137/0804044.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026