The First Step in Vision: Femtosecond Isomerization of Rhodopsin

671 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1991, received 671 indexed citations. Written by R. W. Schoenlein, Linda A. Peteanu, R. A. Mathies and C. V. Shank covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (421 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (316 citations) and Molecular Biology (283 citations). Published in Science.

Countries where authors are citing The First Step in Vision: Femtosecond Isomerization of Rhodopsin

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The First Step in Vision: Femtosecond Isomerization of Rhodopsin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The First Step in Vision: Femtosecond Isomerization of Rhodopsin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The First Step in Vision: Femtosecond Isomerization of Rhodopsin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The First Step in Vision: Femtosecond Isomerization of Rhodopsin

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The First Step in Vision: Femtosecond Isomerization of Rhodopsin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The First Step in Vision: Femtosecond Isomerization of Rhodopsin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1126/science.1925597.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026