Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants

1.6k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2001, received 1.6k indexed citations. Written by Amy H.Y. Tong, Marie Evangelista, Ainslie B. Parsons, Hong Xu, Gary D. Bader, Nicholas F. Page, Mark D. Robinson, Christopher W.V. Hogue, Howard Bussey and Brenda Andrews covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (1.5k citations), Cell Biology (270 citations) and Genetics (175 citations). Published in Science.

Countries where authors are citing Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1126/science.1065810.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026