The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory
- Authors
- Anna Carastathis
- Journal
- Philosophy Compass
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12129 →Countries where authors are citing The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory
This map shows the geographic impact of The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory
This network shows the impact of The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory.
About The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory
This paper, published in 2014, received 274 indexed citations . Written by Anna Carastathis covering the research area of Gender Studies and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (132 citations), Gender Studies (114 citations) and Social Psychology (40 citations). Published in Philosophy Compass.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12129.