The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation

396 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2014, received 396 indexed citations. Written by James J. Chrisman, Jess H. Chua, Alfredo De Massis, Federico Frattini and Mike Wright covering the research area of Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Accounting. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (353 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (284 citations) and Accounting (204 citations). Published in Journal of Product Innovation Management.

Countries where authors are citing The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12207.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026