How to practice person‐centred care: A conceptual framework

565 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2017, received 565 indexed citations. Written by Maria Santana, Kimberly Manalili, Rachel Jolley, Sandra Zelinsky, Hude Quan and Mingshan Lu covering the research area of General Health Professions and Epidemiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (367 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (162 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (69 citations). Published in Health Expectations.

Countries where authors are citing How to practice person‐centred care: A conceptual framework

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of How to practice person‐centred care: A conceptual framework. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by How to practice person‐centred care: A conceptual framework with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites How to practice person‐centred care: A conceptual framework more than expected).

Fields of papers citing How to practice person‐centred care: A conceptual framework

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of How to practice person‐centred care: A conceptual framework. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the How to practice person‐centred care: A conceptual framework.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/hex.12640.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026