The Origins of Children's Growth and Fixed Mindsets: New Research and a New Proposal

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 265 indexed citations. Written by Kyla Haimovitz and Carol S. Dweck covering the research area of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 citations), Social Psychology (124 citations) and Education (115 citations). Published in Child Development.

Countries where authors are citing The Origins of Children's Growth and Fixed Mindsets: New Research and a New Proposal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Origins of Children's Growth and Fixed Mindsets: New Research and a New Proposal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Origins of Children's Growth and Fixed Mindsets: New Research and a New Proposal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Origins of Children's Growth and Fixed Mindsets: New Research and a New Proposal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Origins of Children's Growth and Fixed Mindsets: New Research and a New Proposal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Origins of Children's Growth and Fixed Mindsets: New Research and a New Proposal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Origins of Children's Growth and Fixed Mindsets: New Research and a New Proposal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12955.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026