On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse

510 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2016, received 510 indexed citations. Written by Daniel Berry and Michael T. Willoughby covering the research area of Gender Studies and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (258 citations), Social Psychology (174 citations) and Education (146 citations). Published in Child Development.

Countries where authors are citing On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12660.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026