Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review
- Authors
- David J. HawesPamela Meredith
- Journal
- Child Development Perspectives
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12095 →Countries where authors are citing Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review
This network shows the impact of Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review.
About Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review
This paper, published in 2014, received 320 indexed citations . Written by David J. Hawes and Pamela Meredith covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (216 citations), Education (190 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (65 citations). Published in Child Development Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12095.