Beyond chemoreception: diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects
Countries where authors are citing Beyond chemoreception: diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects
This map shows the geographic impact of Beyond chemoreception: diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beyond chemoreception: diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beyond chemoreception: diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Beyond chemoreception: diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects
This network shows the impact of Beyond chemoreception: diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Beyond chemoreception: diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects.
About Beyond chemoreception: diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects
This paper, published in 2017, received 448 indexed citations . Written by Paolo Pelosi, Immacolata Iovinella, Jiao Zhu, Guirong Wang and Francesca Romana Dani covering the research area of Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Insect Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (339 citations), Insect Science (325 citations) and Genetics (198 citations). Published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/brv.12339.