The global burden of melanoma: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

305 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2017, received 305 indexed citations. Written by Chanté Karimkhani, A. C. Green, Tamar Nijsten, Martin A. Weinstock, Robert P. Dellavalle, Mohsen Naghavi and Christina Fitzmaurice covering the research area of Oncology, Dermatology and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (202 citations), Dermatology (95 citations) and Molecular Biology (86 citations). Published in British Journal of Dermatology.

Countries where authors are citing The global burden of melanoma: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The global burden of melanoma: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The global burden of melanoma: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The global burden of melanoma: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The global burden of melanoma: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The global burden of melanoma: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The global burden of melanoma: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15510.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026