Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons
- Authors
- M. RudermanC. Kittel
- Journal
- Physical Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1103/physrev.96.99 →Countries where authors are citing Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons
This map shows the geographic impact of Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons
This network shows the impact of Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons.
About Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons
This paper, published in 1954, received 2.8k indexed citations . Written by M. Ruderman and C. Kittel covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Radiation and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Condensed Matter Physics (1.7k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.6k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.1k citations). Published in Physical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1103/physrev.96.99.