Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions
2007708 citationsGiuseppe Riva, Fabrizia Mantovani et al.CyberPsychology & Behaviorprofile →
Immersive virtual reality in K‐12 and higher education: A 10‐year systematic review of empirical research
2020283 citationsAnna Flavia Di Natale, Claudia Repetto et al.British Journal of Educational Technologyprofile →
The Role of Spirituality and Religiosity in Subjective Well-Being of Individuals With Different Religious Status
2019195 citationsDaniela Villani, Alessandro Antonietti et al.profile →
Videogames for Emotion Regulation: A Systematic Review
2018179 citationsDaniela Villani, Claudia Carissoli et al.Games for Health Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Villani
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Villani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Villani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Villani more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Villani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Villani. The network helps show where Daniela Villani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela Villani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela Villani.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela Villani based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela Villani. Daniela Villani is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Natale, Anna Flavia Di, Claudia Repetto, Giuseppe Riva, & Daniela Villani. (2020). Immersive virtual reality in K‐12 and higher education: A 10‐year systematic review of empirical research. British Journal of Educational Technology. 51(6). 2006–2033.283 indexed citations breakdown →
Villani, Daniela, Claudia Carissoli, Stefano Triberti, et al.. (2018). Videogames for Emotion Regulation: A Systematic Review. Games for Health Journal. 7(2). 85–99.179 indexed citations breakdown →
Villani, Daniela & Giuseppe Riva. (2008). The role of media in supporting a stress management protocol: An experimental study. 1(2). 159–173.5 indexed citations
14.
Riva, Giuseppe, Fabrizia Mantovani, Alessandra Preziosa, et al.. (2007). Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 10(1). 45–56.708 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Riva, Giuseppe, Alessandra Grassi, Daniela Villani, Andrea Gaggioli, & Alessandra Preziosa. (2007). Managing exam stress using UMTS phones: the advantage of portable audio/video support.. PubMed. 125. 406–8.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.