Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets
- Authors
- Pierre-Yann DolbecEileen Fischer
- Journal
- Journal of Consumer Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/680671 →Countries where authors are citing Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets
This map shows the geographic impact of Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets
This network shows the impact of Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets.
About Refashioning a Field? Connected Consumers and Institutional Dynamics in Markets
This paper, published in 2015, received 219 indexed citations . Written by Pierre-Yann Dolbec and Eileen Fischer covering the research area of Museology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Urban Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Marketing (127 citations), Sociology and Political Science (96 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (64 citations). Published in Journal of Consumer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/680671.