Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections
Countries where authors are citing Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections
This map shows the geographic impact of Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections
This network shows the impact of Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections.
About Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections
This paper, published in 2002, received 662 indexed citations . Written by Naomi P. O’Grady, Mary Alexander, E. Patchen Dellinger, Julie L. Gerberding, Stephen O. Heard, Dennis G. Maki, Henry Masur, Rita D. McCormick, Leonard A. Mermel and Michele L. Pearson covering the research area of General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases and Emergency Medical Services. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Emergency Medical Services (452 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (167 citations) and Epidemiology (148 citations). Published in Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/502007.