Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence

433 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1983, received 433 indexed citations. Written by Catharine A. MacKinnon covering the research area of Religious studies and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (241 citations), Gender Studies (223 citations) and Law (79 citations). Published in Signs.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1086/494000 →

Countries where authors are citing Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/494000.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026